Issue III Released
Home > GESRI Journal > Volume I > Issue III > Staff Contribution
Authors
Eugene Kang*1 and Gesri Editorial Team2
1Harrison High School, Kennesaw, Georgia, United States of America
2The Gesri Journal, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
*Corresponding Author: editors@gesri.org
Received: 25 October 2025
Accepted: 02 November 2025
Published: 05 November 2025
This staff piece examines how a prolonged federal shutdown, compounded by aggressive policy retrenchment, is destabilizing U.S. science. When appropriations lapsed in early October, agencies such as NSF and NIH halted reviews and awards, while NOAA and Smithsonian labs curtailed operations. Universities fronted costs as payments slowed, and time-sensitive experiments and data collection stalled. Examples illustrate cascading risks: delayed panel meetings, inaccessible program officers, and researchers self-funding basic supplies. NASA furloughed most staff, sustaining safety-critical missions; Artemis II continues but faces supply-chain fragility if the impasse persists. Beyond stoppages, structural cuts magnify damage: layoffs at science agencies, the EPA dissolving its research arm, DOE terminating awarded grants, and CDC reductions threatening NHANES. These shocks jeopardize long-term studies, erode institutional knowledge, and divert trainees from research careers. Universities warn of hiring freezes; students and early-career scholars face precarious support and disrupted timelines. International programs are recruiting U.S. scientists, raising serious brain-drain risks. The analysis argues that the confluence of a shutdown and sweeping policy reversals constitutes a perfect storm: it produces immediate backlogs and irrecoverable data gaps while undermining confidence in federal stewardship of research. Restoring momentum will require reopening government, stabilizing funding, rebuilding workforce capacity, and reaffirming commitment to scientific inquiry.